A comparative study between extent analysis method and geometric mean method in fuzzy analytic iderarchy process (FAHP): a case study of selection of best student in a secondary school / Muhamad Hafizudin Mohd Rodi, Mohamad Naqib Mohamad Fauzi and Fatin Norsyabilla Anuar

Mohd Rodi, Muhamad Hafizudin and Mohamad Fauzi, Mohamad Naqib and Anuar, Fatin Norsyabilla (2019) A comparative study between extent analysis method and geometric mean method in fuzzy analytic iderarchy process (FAHP): a case study of selection of best student in a secondary school / Muhamad Hafizudin Mohd Rodi, Mohamad Naqib Mohamad Fauzi and Fatin Norsyabilla Anuar. [Student Project] (Unpublished)

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) is a process of weighting and selecting the best alternative based on a set of criteria. Selection of best student in a secondary school is one of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem that occur in the education field. The objective of this study are to apply the extent analysis method and geometric mean method in FAHP to solve multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem, to compare two different methods of FAHP which are the geometric mean method and extent analysis method and to select the best method between extent analysis method and the geometric mean method in FAHP. There alternatives for this MCDM problem are five students and there are four criteria involved which are academic, co-curriculum, personality and attendance. Both alternatives and criteria were gathered from the expert which is the teacher of the respective secondary school and ten teachers who know enough the five students were chosen as the respondents. The result from this study shows that both extent analysis and geometric mean method in FAHP produced a different weight of criteria and alternative but for the best student selection, both methods showed that student 1 is the best student. Sensitivity analysis was conducted by shifting the value of each criterion to zero to find out whether there is a significant influence in the ranking of alternatives. The conclusions for this study are student 1 is the best student in a secondary school, both methods have been compared in terms of the weight priorities and ranking of each criterion and alternative and last but not least, geometric mean method is the best method for this study compared to the extent analysis method in FAHP because it produced a small error and least time consuming when computing the method.

Metadata

Item Type: Student Project
Creators:
CreatorsEmail / ID. Num
Mohd Rodi, Muhamad HafizudinUNSPECIFIED
Mohamad Fauzi, Mohamad NaqibUNSPECIFIED
Anuar, Fatin NorsyabillaUNSPECIFIED
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics > Fuzzy arithmetic
Q Science > QA Mathematics > Analysis > Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems
Q Science > QA Mathematics > Geometry. Trigonometry. Topology
Q Science > QA Mathematics > Fuzzy logic
Divisions: Universiti Teknologi MARA, Negeri Sembilan > Seremban Campus > Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences
Programme: Bachelor of Science (Hons.) (Management Mathematics)
Item ID: 37413
Uncontrolled Keywords: comparative study, between extent analysis method, geometric mean method, fuzzy analytic iderarchy process (FAHP), best student, secondary school
URI: http://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/37413

Download

[img] Text
37413.PDF

Download (397kB)

Fulltext

Fulltext is available at:
  • Koleksi Akses Terhad | PTAR KampusSeremban
  • ID Number

    37413

    Others


    View in Google Scholar

    Actions (login required)

    View Item View Item

    Downloads

    Downloads per month over past year