Abstract
Market orientation (MO) is one of the major research streams in strategic marketing developed during the past ten years. Since its inception in the early 1992, the major thrust of research in market orientation has been to study the relationship between market orientation and business performance with service quality as the mediator. Although it is acknowledged that market orientation and business performance (BP) are likely correlated, this paper directs attention to what may lie beneath the relationship. From both conceptual and empirical perspectives, it is argued that future research should focus on the mechanisms by which market orientation contributes to business performance. Market orientation is positioned as marketing's contribution to business strategy and is considered an important strategic orientation position market orientation as marketing's explanation of performance differentials between firms. These advantages of market orientation are generally argued to be a consequence of improved market-sensing capabilities and thus improved market responsiveness, particular in more hostile and unpredictable environments. In relation to the above arguments, this study attempts to investigate the relationship between market orientation and service quality (SQ) and the implication on business performance. The determinant of the of the study framework model of market orientation, service quality and business performance adopted by Chang and Chen, (1998) is used as grounded theory for this study. Samples comprised of 41 hotel managers from four and five star hotels in the Klang Valley of Malaysia and were obtained through a mail survey questionnaire. The measurement technique used was the Likert Scale of five points scaling. Market orientation was measured using the adopted 20-item MARKOR scale by Kohli et al. (1993). The market orientation items include 1) intelligence generation (IG), 2) intelligence dissemination (ID), and 3) responsiveness to market intelligence (RMI). The 22-item SERQUAL scale by Parasuraman et al, (1988) was adopted as the instrumentation for service quality for this study. The service quality variables include 1) tangibility (Tang), 2) responsiveness (Res), 3) reliability (Rel), 4) accuracy (Ace), and 5) empathy (Emp). As for the business performance, three performance measures were used in this study; 1) occupancy %, 2) return of assets (ROA), and 3) return of sales (ROS). The research hypotheses were tested using the multiple regression analyses. The stepwise regression results revealed that 1) there is a significant relationship between market orientation and service quality, 2) there is a significant relationship between market orientation and business performance, 3) there is a significant relationship between service quality and business performance, and 4) service quality mediates the relationship between market orientation and business performance.
Metadata
Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Lopez, Muhammad Bonnie 2005713942 |
Contributors: | Contribution Name Email / ID Num. Thesis advisor Radzi, Salleh Mohd UNSPECIFIED |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > Customer services. Customer relations T Technology > TX Home economics > Hotels. Bed and breakfast accommodations |
Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Faculty of Hotel and Tourism Management |
Programme: | Master of Science in Hotel Management |
Keywords: | Hotel, quality, service |
Date: | 2010 |
URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/39546 |
Download
39546.pdf
Download (175kB)