Abstract
This research aims at looking at the reasons why Malaysian courts do not adopt the Multiple Test in deciding Special Relationship in the Doctrine of Vicarious Liability. The team of five members conducted this research as part of the requirement for a Degree in the Bachelor in Legal Studies (Hons.) programme in Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam in determining whether the Multiple Test is the most appropriate test to be used in determining the existence of Special Relationship in the Doctrine of Vicarious Liability. The five chapters of the research discuss the application of the Multiple Test by conducting case studies in The United Kingdom and Malaysia as to the application of the Multiple Test for Special Relationship in the Doctrine of Vicarious Liability. In most of the cases, it was found that the Multiple Test was only mentioned but was not used by the United Kingdom and Malaysian courts. The Multiple Test should be regarded as the best test as it incorporates with the Control Test and the Organisation Test to determine the existence of Special Relationship since the test will cover all types of employees.
Metadata
Item Type: | Student Project |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Abd Razak, Rafiqah 2007144193 Baharuddin, Nor Adila 2007144497 Ismail, Noor Farazidah 2007144487 Amin Nudin, Noorsaliza 2007144495 Syed Abdul Rahman, Sharifah Khalisha 2007144203 |
Contributors: | Contribution Name Email / ID Num. Thesis advisor Abu Hasan, Norila UNSPECIFIED |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform Law > Courts. Procedure |
Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Faculty of Law |
Programme: | Bachelor of Legal Studies (Hons) |
Keywords: | Courts, Doctrine, Vicarious liability |
Date: | 2010 |
URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/28368 |
Download
28368.pdf
Download (6MB)