Abstract
Air pollution poses a significant threat to public health and the environment, necessitating the development of effective forecasting techniques to aid in pollution management and mitigation efforts. This study conducts a comparative analysis of two prominent time series forecasting methods, namely Exponential Smoothing and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), to predict air pollution levels. The primary objective is to evaluate the performance and accuracy of these methods in capturing the dynamic and complex patterns inherent in air quality data.The findings reveal that, in this specific context, the Exponential Smoothing method, particularly Holt-Winters, consistently demonstrates a lower Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) compared to ARIMA. This suggests that Holt-Winters Exponential Smoothing provides more accurate predictions for air pollution levels.
Metadata
Item Type: | Thesis (Degree) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Mat Zain, Mohammad Nuzul Hakimi 2020608916 |
Contributors: | Contribution Name Email / ID Num. Thesis advisor Mat Ripin, Rohayati UNSPECIFIED |
Subjects: | Q Science > QA Mathematics > Analysis > Analytical methods used in the solution of physical problems |
Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Terengganu > Kuala Terengganu Campus > Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences |
Programme: | Bachelor of Science (Hons.) Mathematical Modelling and Analytics |
Keywords: | Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Exponential Smoothing |
Date: | 2024 |
URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/95237 |
Download
95237.pdf
Download (91kB)