Abstract
The conciliatory bodies appointed under section 106 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) 1976 Act are not effective while, the existing legal provisions concerning reconciliation process are not adequate to reconcile the matrimonial disputes of non-Muslims. This paper starts with the interpretation on descriptive statistics of demographic characteristics of the respondents, followed by test of the knowledge of the respondents on the law, satisfaction of the respondents with the process of reconciliation and lastly, on the outcome of the process. Every part of the questionnaires was tested by using the normality test to determine if a data set is well-modeled by a normal distribution. The statistical methods employed in this study range from frequency distribution, descriptive statistics, and non-parametric analysis. The finding shows that although the respondents are quite satisfied with the reconciliation session, but it still fails to reconcile the disputing parties. Suggestions for improvement of the existing practice are also discussed.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Rahmat, Nur Ezan mailto:nurezanrahmat@gmail.com Abdul Hak, Nora UNSPECIFIED |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HQ The family. Marriage. Woman > The family. Marriage. Home H Social Sciences > HV Social pathology. Social and public welfare. Criminology > Protection, assistance and relief |
Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Faculty of Law |
Journal or Publication Title: | UiTM Journal of Legal Studies |
UiTM Journal Collections: | UiTM Journal > UiTM Journal of Legal Studies |
ISSN: | 2600-8955 |
Volume: | 2 |
Number: | 2 |
Page Range: | pp. 43-60 |
Keywords: | Perceptions; reconciliation process; marriage tribunal |
Date: | January 2020 |
URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/45016 |