Abstract
The objective of this research is to analyse on how the law on licensing moneylending activities works by comparing Malaysian law to the law in the United Kingdom and Singapore. The number of illegal moneylender's problem keeps rising. This indicates that there must be something wrong with the law. This project paper shall cover Malaysia Moneylenders Act 1951 as amended in 2003, the Singapore Moneylenders Act 2008 Singapore and Consumer Credit Act 2006 of the United Kingdom. In this research, qualitative research methodology was utilized in this study, where two in-depth interviews have been conducted with the Ministry of Housing and Local Development and the other one with Malaysian Licensing Moneylenders Association (MILMA). The interviews show that the Singapore Moneylenders Act 2008 and the UK Consumer Credit Act 2008 is better than Malaysian Moneylenders Act 1951 as amended in 2003 does not cover all aspects regarding moneylending activities. In this research, for the issue of Ah Longs, it is limited only to issue of licensing rather than other aspects. This is important to make sure that issues that we are focusing for will be discuss in detail. The purpose is to see how the law on licensing in Malaysia relates to the issue of loan sharks.
Metadata
Item Type: | Thesis (Degree) |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Adznan, Azian 2007143811 Aminuddin, Herni Laily 2007143847 Mohd Asri, Izzati 2007143855 Ku Yosof, Ku Mohd Amir Aizat 2007143859 |
Contributors: | Contribution Name Email / ID Num. Thesis advisor Abdul Hamid, Norliza UNSPECIFIED |
Subjects: | K Law > K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence > Comparative law. International uniform Law > Regulation of industry, trade, and commerce. Occupational law |
Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Faculty of Law |
Programme: | Bachelor in Legal Studies (Hons) |
Keywords: | moneylending, licensing, law |
Date: | April 2010 |
URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/32974 |
Download
32974.pdf
Download (135kB)