Lexical hedges : A study of cultural and disciplinary variation in academic research articles / Sarmad J. Mohammed

J. Mohammed, Sarmad (2011) Lexical hedges : A study of cultural and disciplinary variation in academic research articles / Sarmad J. Mohammed. Masters thesis, Universiti Teknologi MARA.

Download

[thumbnail of TM_SARMAD J. MOHAMMED ED 11_5.PDF] Text
TM_SARMAD J. MOHAMMED ED 11_5.PDF

Download (2MB)

Abstract

There is a widely held belief that academic writing is purely objective, impersonal and
informational, designed to disguise the author and deal directly with facts and the search for
independent truth. But effective academic writing is like any other type of discourse in that
it is interactive; it involves writers trying to influence their reader by persuading them of the
correctness of their claims (Hyland, 1998a, p. iii). One important means of achieving this is
the use of hedges to present claims with caution, precision, and humility. Hedging is one of
the features associated with academic writing.
This study examines the distribution of forms and functions of lexical hedges in a corpus
of 24 research articles written in English. A total of almost 48,000 words are analyzed from
two different disciplines namely biochemistry and applied linguistics, and from two
rhetorical sections namely introduction and discussion sections. I also explore how the
writers from different cultures employ these means in their academic writing.
The results show that the American authors use 14% more hedging forms than Arabic
authors in biochemistry discipline and almost 15% in the applied linguistics discipline. On
the other hand, the results also reveal that linguists used hedges considerably less than the
scientists in both genres. In terms of hedging functions, the results show that American
authors employed more hedging function than Arabic authors in both disciplines. The
discussion sections of RAs contain more hedging forms and functions than the introduction
sections in both disciplines. In the overall incidence of hedging, however, the results
indicate that noticeable, disciplinary variation in the use of lexical hedges is found in the RA
corpus, hedging becoming more frequent in the field of biochemistry in comparison with the .- field of applied linguistic.

Metadata

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Creators:
Creators
Email
J. Mohammed, Sarmad
UNSPECIFIED
Subjects: L Education > LB Theory and practice of education > Higher Education > Dissertations, Academic. Preparation of theses > Malaysia
P Language and Literature > PE English language > Modern English > Special classes of composition > Report writing
Divisions: Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Faculty of Education
Item ID: 14911
Uncontrolled Keywords: Academic writing; Impersonal and informational; Hedging
URI: https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/14911

Fulltext

Fulltext is available at:
  • Library Terminal Workstation (Digital Format) - Accessible via UiTM Libraries
  • ID Number

    14911

    Indexing


    View in Google Scholar

    Edit Item
    Edit Item