Abstract
Ethics emerges from 'the theoretical domains of philosophy' and applied in modem medicine to assist healthcare staff in addressing an array of moral questions. However, ethical values between patient and healthcare staff often collided, leading to ethical conflicts and dilemmas in clinical settings. Ethics deliberation, a skill to resolve ethical conflicts, is not possessed by all. Controversies like the Seattle God Committee, Re Quinlan, Baby Jane Doe, and many others have contributed to the slow emergence of clinical ethics committees (CEC) to solve ethical dilemmas in the United States of America since the 1970s (Tapper, 2013). However, the number of CEC spurred when the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations (]CAHO) recommended that each hospital seeking its accreditation should have a mechanism to address ethical dilemmas within their institutions (Aulisio, 2016). Many changes have been made in the development of CEC around the world. CEC in some countries (the United States of America and Canada) are mandated by an accreditation body. Some countries (Belgium, Norway, and Singapore) had mandated the establishment of CEC by law while other countries (Ireland, the Netherlands, France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, Lithuania, Croatia, Bulgarian, Israel, Japan, and New Zealand) reported the emergence of CEC based on grassroots phenomenon (Worthington & Macdonald, 2012). However, according to Khoo, Siew, Thong, Alwi, & Lantos (2019), there is no institution-based ethics consultation service available in Malaysia. There is a lacuna in the existing literature on the need and demand for Clinical Ethics Support Services (CESS) in Malaysia with the type of CESS that will be the most feasible for application in Malaysia. Using a library-based search method to elaborate on how other countries utilise CESS, the study will explore the various methods for delivering CESS, which will lead to the discussion on whether it is feasible to establish CEC in Malaysia. The study will justify why a modified model of a CEC is the most practical method to deliver CESS in Malaysia as an initiative to assist ethical decision-making in the healthcare industry that respects different values held by different parties for the benefit of both healthcare staff and patients.
Metadata
| Item Type: | Thesis (Masters) |
|---|---|
| Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Razali, Hazdalila yais UNSPECIFIED |
| Contributors: | Contribution Name Email / ID Num. Thesis advisor Kiak Min, Mark Tan UNSPECIFIED |
| Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology > Culture > Sociology of knowledge > Malaysia P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics > Study and teaching. Research > individual differences T Technology > TK Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering > Electronics > Computer engineering. Computer hardware > Malaysia |
| Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor > Sungai Buloh Campus Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor > Sungai Buloh Campus > Faculty of Medicine |
| Programme: | Master in Medical Ethics and Medical Jurisprudence |
| Keywords: | individual or a society,currently shaped modem medicine,local culture |
| Date: | January 2020 |
| URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/129879 |
Download
129879.pdf
Download (1MB)
Digital Copy
Physical Copy
- Bilik Koleksi Harta Intelek, Unit Terbitan Bersiri dan Elektronik | PTAR Puncak Alam
ID Number
129879
Indexing
