Methodological approaches to developing the auditing investigation records and information (AIRI) framework: a case study at a major enforcement agency

This paper outlines the research methodology used to develop the Auditing Investigation Records and Information (AIRI) framework, focusing on a structured approach for similar studies. Grounded in a pragmatic philosophical foundation, the research employed a qualitative case study design, making it adaptable to the complex real-world environment of law enforcement. Data was collected using a combination of semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and direct observations, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of existing auditing practices within the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP). The purposive sampling strategy selected 13 informants directly involved in the auditing process, providing detailed insights into current challenges and procedural gaps. Thematic analysis was employed, using both inductive and deductive reasoning to identify key themes from the data. Triangulation across multiple data sources enhanced the reliability and validity of the findings. This methodological approach was instrumental in informing the design of the AIRI framework, offering a practical, adaptable solution for auditing investigation records. The study's focus on methodological rigor offers valuable insights for researchers seeking to structure their research methodologies in similar organizational contexts, particularly in the fields of records management and law enforcement.