Comparative performance of urine and blood-based attributes in chronic kidney disease prediction using artificial neural network / M. H. A. Ghafar ... [et al.]

Ghafar, M. H. A. and A. Razak, Abdul Hadi and Megat Ali, Megat Syahirul Amin and Al Junid, Syed Abdul Mutalib and Ahmad, Adizul and A. Latip, Mohd Fuad and Taib, Mohd Nasir and M., Fatimah (2020) Comparative performance of urine and blood-based attributes in chronic kidney disease prediction using artificial neural network / M. H. A. Ghafar ... [et al.]. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Systems Research (JEESR), 17 (2): 3. pp. 17-28. ISSN 1985-5389
Identification Number (DOI): 10.24191/jeesr.v17i1.003
Abstract

Chronic Kidney Disease is one of the leading causes of death worldwide. An intelligent diagnostic system capable of evarly detection is therefore, becoming increasingly important. These would allow effective intervention to be delivered to patients, thus prolonging kidney function and reducing risk of mortality. The system should be non-invasive, convenient, accurate, and reliable in detecting the required attributes. This study compares between urine- and blood-based attributes in acute renal failure prediction using artificial neural network. A total of 400 sample data is obtained from UCI Machine Learning Repository. Multiple imputation is then implemented to generate synthetic data. These overcome the issue of missing datapoints and unbalanced sample distribution. Two artificial neural network models are trained. One using the urine-based attributes and the other, using bloodbased attributes. Both models attained excellent classification accuracies of 96.0% and 98.0%, respectively. However, the ANN model developed based on urine-based attributes are recommended intelligent diagnostic systems due to lower computational requirements and the sample acquisition protocol is much convenient for patients and medical practitioners.

Item Details
Edit Item
Edit Item
Downloads & Files
[thumbnail of 42380.pdf]
Text
42380.pdf
Download (776kB)
Indexing & Metrics
Citations
2 Google Scholar Citations