Collision-aware trajectory planning for passenger boarding bridges in airport apron

Thederajan, Abishai Asir A. and Low, Cheng Yee and Yee, Jingye and Koh, Ching Theng and Abd Rahman, Ramhuzaini and Seidenberg, Tobias (2026) Collision-aware trajectory planning for passenger boarding bridges in airport apron. Journal of Mechanical Engineering (JMechE), 23 (3): 11. pp. 216-234. ISSN 2550-164X
Identification Number (DOI): 10.24191/jmeche.v23i3.13743
Abstract

Passenger Boarding Bridges (PBBs) are the primary physical interface between terminal buildings and aircraft, yet current semi-automated systems execute pre-programmed trajectory sequences designed for static environments and lack real-time obstacle awareness. This makes them unsuitable for aprons, where ground support vehicles, cargo equipment, and personnel continuously occupy the docking corridor. This study presents and validates a collision-aware trajectory planning framework for autonomous PBB docking, implemented in Robot Operating System 2 (ROS 2) and MoveIt 2. Rather than committing to a single fixed path, the framework uses the MoveIt Task Constructor (MTC) to evaluate four topologically distinct docking routes in parallel and autonomously select the fastest collision-free trajectory, falling back automatically when the primary route is obstructed. The framework was validated in kinematic simulation over 80 runs, comparing RRTConnect and RRT* across unobstructed and obstructed scenarios, with obstacles registered directly as collision objects. A planner returning a trajectory proved an insufficient safety criterion: under obstruction, RRTConnect returned a trajectory in every run, but 70% violated joint constraints or penetrated obstacle geometry at execution-time validation, whereas RRT* produced no such failures across 40 runs and selected the correct fallback strategy in all 20 obstructed runs. RRT* required roughly 10 times more planning time than RRTConnect (21.3 s versus 1.7 s) yet yielded an identical execution time in the unobstructed scenario (96.3 s). These results indicate that asymptotically optimal planning and execution-time trajectory validation are both necessary for safe autonomous PBB docking under the tested single-obstacle configuration.

Item Details
Edit Item
Edit Item
Downloads & Files
[thumbnail of 147361.pdf]
Text
147361.pdf
Download (1MB)
Indexing & Metrics