Abstract
The death penalty has always been a controversial issue in Malaysia. Historically, tracing back to British colonial times, Malaysia has adopted capital punishment as a preventive measure against serious crimes. The death penalty was seen as a necessary tool to maintain public order and safety, particularly in response to the increase of crime rates. However, the implementation of the death penalty has faced backlashes from human rights advocates, legal scholars, and the international community, who argue that it is an inhumane and ineffective form of punishment. The mandatory death penalty in Malaysia authorized the courts to punish individuals convicted of certain serious offenses, such as murder and drug trafficking, with a death sentence without the option of alternative punishment. This one-size-fits-all approach to justice raised concerns regarding judicial discretion and the potential for miscarriages of justice. The critics emphasized the lack of consideration for mitigating factors, such as the situations surrounding the crime or the offender's background, which could result in excessively harsh sentences. Accordingly, the mandatory death penalty became a crucial point for debates on legal reform and human rights in the country. Finally in 2023, Malaysia has taken significant steps towards reforming its capital punishment laws, ending in the abolishment of the mandatory death penalty through the enactment of the Abolition of Mandatory Death Penalty Act 2023. This article aims to provide an overview of the abolition of the death penalty in Malaysia. In doing so, it explores the historical context of the issue and the legal implications of the relevant laws. To offer a more holistic perspective, it also highlights developments in neighbouring countries. The significance of this article lies not only in its relevance to Malaysian law but also in its wider implications for human rights and justice in the region.
