Abstract
In emerging markets, the concentration of corporate ownership has created agency conflicts between controlling owners and minority shareholders, which are difficult to mitigate through conventional corporate control mechanisms such as boards of directors and takeovers. This study examines whether external independent auditors could be employed as monitors and as bonding mechanisms to alleviate these agency conflicts. Using a broad sample of firms
from eight East Asian economies, we document that firms are more likely to employ Big Five auditors when they are subject to the agency problem imbedded in their ownership structure. In addition, among East Asian auditees subject to
the agency problem, Big Five auditors charge a higher fee and set a lower audit modification threshold while non-Big Five auditors do not. Taken together, this evidence suggests that Big Five auditors in emerging markets do have a corporate governance role.
Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Fan, Joseph P. H. UNSPECIFIED Wong, T.J. UNSPECIFIED |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > Corporations > Corporate organization. Corporate governance > Malaysia H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > Accounting. Bookkeeping > Accountants H Social Sciences > HF Commerce > Accounting. Bookkeeping > Managerial accounting |
Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Accounting Research Institute (ARI) |
Journal or Publication Title: | Malaysian Accounting Review |
UiTM Journal Collections: | UiTM Journal > Management & Accounting Review (MAR) |
ISSN: | 1675-4077 |
Volume: | 2 |
Number: | 1 |
Page Range: | pp. 13-45 |
Keywords: | Emerging markets, corporate ownership, conventional corporate, shareholders |
Date: | 2003 |
URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/13684 |