Abstract
“ The reform to the divorce law under the 1976 Act has not been that all innovative and revolutionary. There are some notable defects, some inevitable others uncalled for. Like a new consumer product in the marked only the package has changed, the ingredients still remain except perhaps with a few additions here and there - What was recognised as a fault principle has been branded as 'irretrievable breakdown'. What was meant to be a simple law suffers a complex disease of legal interpretation. Nevertheless, the Royal Commission should be commended in its effort to unify the law.” …..p. 32 “ Take adultery as an example. It has been recognised as a grave matrimonial misconduct that goes to the root of the marriage. It has been accepted as a cause of marriage breakdown. To disregard it would be contrary to public policy, to adopt it would be contrary to the policy of the new divorce law. It thereby becomes a question of priority. It is no easier than to resolve the problem of the ‘chicken and the egg’, the cause of breakdown or the effects of breakdown”….. p. 33
Metadata
| Item Type: | Student Project |
|---|---|
| Creators: | Creators Email / ID Num. Mohd Sharif, Ishak UNSPECIFIED |
| Subjects: | K Law > K Law in general. Comparative and uniform law. Jurisprudence |
| Divisions: | Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam > Faculty of Law |
| Date: | 1983 |
| URI: | https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/1333 |
Download
PPd_ISHAK MOHD SHARIF LW 83_5 P01.pdf
Download (86kB)
Digital Copy
Physical Copy
ID Number
1333
Indexing
